Set it, supervise it, sign it.

Fabricated citations. Courts have sanctioned filings that cite AI-invented case law. In the engine, a case citation reaches a filing only as a verified row in the Citation Ledger, and the engine blocks any case citation without one. See how each case citation is verified.

Blown deadlines. Every deadline is computed from the document's face and the governing rule, then, by default, computed again by a second model from the same text. A mismatch is resolved on the rule text, never averaged. The results live in the docket manager, in your client account.

Losing control of the work. The engine works between your 3 checkpoints, and each approval, or the client's recorded standing instruction to proceed, is stamped in the record.

Filings bounced or arguments waived. Official rule text is fetched before strategy and re-checked before drafting and before the final read. Every issue is mapped to where it must be raised to stay alive in each court above; see the preservation map.

• Verified. Research from primary law, ranked by the courts that bind yours. Every case relied on is read in full. Every case citation meets the four-part standard (primary source, read in full, supports the point, still good law) and is recorded in the ledger with who verified it and when.
• Adversarial. By default, two model families from two different companies, currently Anthropic's Claude and xAI's Grok, work the matter. The strategy is attacked as opposing counsel and a hostile panel would attack it, and the draft is attacked again. Every vulnerable point is rewritten so that skipping it becomes reviewable error.
• Autonomous. The work runs on its own between 3 checkpoints and stops at the checkpoints where, by default, your attorney approves, with a written check on each of the 93 defined steps (30 Sep 2026).
• Operational. A live docket with deadlines computed twice by default, and nothing closed until the obligation is discharged. Many matters run in parallel, with throughput governed by quality.

Claude is a trademark of Anthropic, PBC. Grok is a trademark of xAI Corp. Other names are trademarks of their respective owners and are used only to describe the technology in our process. Legal Ops Depot is not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by Anthropic or xAI.

By default, the engine stops for you 3 times. These are the checkpoints where you decide:

Checkpoint	What the supervising attorney receives	What they decide
1. The consult	The intake record, the record review, the candidate filing type, the required companion filings and the court's rules for that filing	Whether the problem is framed right and the filing type is the right one
2. Strategy sign-off	The one-page candid assessment, the competing plans, the theories ledger, the preservation map and the debate record	Whether to proceed, pivot or stop
3. Final read	The exact pages to be filed, the review summary of what was corrected and what to watch, and the verification record	Whether these pages go out

By default, you approve twice, and the whole filing gets a final read before it ships; each approval, or the client's recorded standing instruction to proceed, is stamped in the record. A firm that records a standing instruction for a matter should know what it does: it clears the checkpoints, including the final read, in place of an approval at each one. A standing instruction never lifts a hold, and the candid analysis still runs. The safeguards page sets out the details.

Before a word is drafted, the engine produces a one-page candid assessment of the client's position under current controlling law, for the supervising attorney.

Illustration, fictional matter.

The candid assessment

Verdict

UNCERTAIN

1. WIN
2. LOSE
3. UNCERTAIN

• The law for the positionverified
• The law against itfound by the adverse sweep
• The best pivot

Illustration: fictional matter, fictional courts and invented authorities. It shows the format of the assessment, not a real result.

Verdict: WIN, LOSE or UNCERTAIN. In the illustration: UNCERTAIN.

• The law for the position: the controlling authority that supports it, each case citation verified.
• The law against it: the controlling authority that cuts the other way, found by the adverse sweep.
• The best pivot: on LOSE or UNCERTAIN, the strongest alternative, or a plain statement that the matter may not be worth filing.

The assessment is work product for the supervising attorney. It is not a prediction, and it does not decide anything; the attorney does.

The engine is built to support the professional duties a firm already has. It never discharges them. The mapping below is how the engine's process lines up with those duties, offered as information, not as advice to the firm.

• Supervision of nonlawyer assistance (ABA Model Rule 5.3). The 3 checkpoints, the stamped approvals and the separation of builder, verifier and final reader, wherever the roles allow, give a supervising attorney defined points to direct and review the work.
• Lawyers' use of generative AI (ABA Formal Opinion 512 (2024)). Verification of each case citation against the primary source, receipts for every rule and source, and a record of what each model did support competence and candor when AI is part of the work.
• Outsourced legal support (ABA Formal Opinion 08-451). The engine's output reaches the firm as work product for its lawyers to review and adopt, with the record needed to do that.
• Candor about adverse authority (ABA Model Rule 3.3(a)(2)). Research runs in both directions, and controlling adverse authority stops the line until a pivot is recorded, so the attorney can address it.

What stays with the firm's attorneys: professional judgment, the signature, candor to the court, communication with the client, and fees.

A growing number of courts and individual judges have issued standing orders about the use of generative AI in filings, some requiring a certification. The duty to comply is the filing attorney's. The engine's receipts, a record of what was researched, what was verified against what source, and what each model did, are the kind of record an attorney may want in hand when completing such a certification. This site makes no claim that the engine checks for these orders.

The engine was designed for hard matters, led by civil complaints and civil-rights claims under § 1983 and by petitions, post-conviction and to the U.S. Supreme Court, with appeals and dispositive motions run through the same process. For firms, two pages go deeper: appellate work and motion practice.

The engine runs many matters in parallel, each through the same phases and the same checks. Its throughput is governed by quality: the judgment-heavy work widens only as evaluations show it can do so without errors. Routine filings can take an express lane that skips the strategy work but never the verification, the final read or the packet check. We do not publish volume or speed figures until they are measured and documented.

A firm can start with one matter. Email us first, and we'll answer the team's questions about the checkpoints, the candid assessment and the ledger before any client file is involved. After that, the firm decides which matters to run and who in the firm approves at each checkpoint.

The engine is built for civil complaints, civil-rights claims under § 1983, post-conviction petitions, petitions to the U.S. Supreme Court, appeals and dispositive motions. Filings are ordered on Legal Ops Depot's main site, and pricing is at legalopsdepot.com/pricing (opens the main site). For a set of matters, or work not listed there, ask for a quote.

Legal Ops Depot is not a law firm and does not give legal advice.

Connect your firm's own AI agents to Legal Ops Depot's law library through the read-only MCP connector, or call the same tools from your own software with an API key. Pricing for heavier daily use is on the main site.

See pricing (opens the main site) How to connect

Each client has their own account, with a docket manager that shows where every piece of work stands. You set it and forget it. For a firm, the account holds its matters, their deadlines and the clerk's docket entries in one place, and the firm decides who approves at each of the 3 checkpoints.

Sign in (opens the main site)

Firms will rightly ask where client data is kept. Matter records and the files you upload are stored in Legal Ops Depot's own Cloudflare account: records in a Cloudflare D1 database and files in Cloudflare R2 storage. Cloudflare's documentation states that objects stored in D1 and R2 are encrypted at rest with AES-256, and that data moving to and from them is secured with TLS. For anything else about data handling, email us and we will answer in writing, with facts, not adjectives.

You won't find client counts, success rates, hours-saved figures, testimonials or client logos here. We publish a number only when it is measured, dated and on file, and we never use any client's matter as marketing.

• Legal Ops Depot is not a law firm and does not give legal advice. Using the engine creates no attorney-client relationship between Legal Ops Depot and the firm's client.
• The engine does not sign anything, and it does not decide strategy for the firm. The firm's attorneys do.
• We do not promise outcomes, and we do not publish testimonials or results we do not have.

Read the full disclosures and the answers to firm questions.

Who signs the filing? The firm's attorneys. They supervise the work and sign the filing, and they remain responsible for it. Legal Ops Depot is not a law firm and does not give legal advice.

What does the firm get back? A court-ready draft built to the court's rules, the citation ledger with a source for each case citation, the candid assessment, the preservation map, the debate records and a live docket in the docket manager in your client account.

Can we see how a case citation was verified? Yes. Each case citation in a draft traces back to its ledger row, its source and the quotation relied on.

Does it replace associates or paralegals? It does not replace anyone's judgment. It does the research, drafting, checking and docketing work to a written standard, and leaves the decisions to the firm's attorneys at the checkpoints.

Can the firm's attorneys review the final pages before filing? Yes. By default, the matter stops at the final read until you approve the exact pages. A client can instead record a standing instruction to proceed; it is stamped in the record at every checkpoint it clears.

Which AI models does it use? By default, two model families from two different companies, currently Anthropic's Claude and xAI's Grok. Claude is a trademark of Anthropic, PBC. Grok is a trademark of xAI Corp. Other names are trademarks of their respective owners and are used only to describe the technology in our process. Legal Ops Depot is not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by Anthropic or xAI.

What does it cost? Pricing is on the main site: legalopsdepot.com/pricing (opens the main site). Email us and we'll talk through your matters. To order, start a request (opens the main site) on the main site or request a quote (opens the main site).

Email us with your firm's questions about the 15 phases, the 3 checkpoints, the candid assessment, the citation ledger, supervision and data.

Start a request (opens the main site) Request a quote (opens the main site)

Legal Ops Depot is not a law firm and does not give legal advice.

Representing yourself? See how the engine works for you.